China's Refractories ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 11-20.DOI: 10.19691/j.cnki.1004-4493.2020.02.003
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Wei1,2,*(), ZHANG Xiaohui1, ZHANG Haijun2
Revised:
2021-05-13
Online:
2020-06-15
Published:
2020-06-15
Contact:
CHEN Wei
About author:
Chen Wei, born in 1983, obtained his bachelor's degree with the major of materials science and engineering from Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology in 2006 and master's degree with the major of materials science from Wuhan University of Science and Technology in 2018. Since 2006, he has been working in Sinosteel Luoyang Institute of Refractories Research Co., Ltd. At present, he is the deputy executive general manager of Sinosteel Nanjing Environmental Materials Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., (in preparation) and the vice director of the National Quality Supervision and Inspection Center for Refractories. His research interest is the performance test and characterization of refractories. He, as the group leader, has set three national standards as well as one industry standard on refractory testing methods.
CHEN Wei, ZHANG Xiaohui, ZHANG Haijun. Slag Resistance of Refractories for Direct Reduction of Laterite Nickel Ores in Rotary Kilns[J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(2): 11-20.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cnref.cn/EN/10.19691/j.cnki.1004-4493.2020.02.003
Samples | AP /% | BD /(g · cm-3) | CCS /MPa | RUL /℃ | HMOR /MPa | Thermal shock resistance (1 100 ℃, water quenching) /cycles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High alumina bricks | 19.1 | 138 | 1 550 | |||
Corundum bricks | 18.6 | 3.22 | 111 | >1 700 | ≥6 | |
High alumina silicon carbide bricks | 19.8 | 2.70 | 93.4 | |||
Chrome corundum bricks | 3.45 | 335 | ||||
Chrome corundum castable | 3.32 | 151 | ||||
Spinel chrome corundum bricks | 3.43 | 220 | 17.4 (1 450 ℃×0.5 h) | >13 | ||
Magnesium aluminate spinel bricks | 2.93 | 61.8 | >1 700 | >10 | ||
Magnesia chrome bricks | 3.28 | 72.1 | 8.2 (1 450 ℃×0.5 h) | >10 | ||
Magnesia alumina chrome composite spinel bricks | 3.03 | 61.1 | ||||
Silicon nitride bonded silicon carbide bricks | 16 | 2.66 | 190 | 61.1 (1 400 ℃×0.5 h) |
Table 1 Physical properties of test bricks
Samples | AP /% | BD /(g · cm-3) | CCS /MPa | RUL /℃ | HMOR /MPa | Thermal shock resistance (1 100 ℃, water quenching) /cycles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High alumina bricks | 19.1 | 138 | 1 550 | |||
Corundum bricks | 18.6 | 3.22 | 111 | >1 700 | ≥6 | |
High alumina silicon carbide bricks | 19.8 | 2.70 | 93.4 | |||
Chrome corundum bricks | 3.45 | 335 | ||||
Chrome corundum castable | 3.32 | 151 | ||||
Spinel chrome corundum bricks | 3.43 | 220 | 17.4 (1 450 ℃×0.5 h) | >13 | ||
Magnesium aluminate spinel bricks | 2.93 | 61.8 | >1 700 | >10 | ||
Magnesia chrome bricks | 3.28 | 72.1 | 8.2 (1 450 ℃×0.5 h) | >10 | ||
Magnesia alumina chrome composite spinel bricks | 3.03 | 61.1 | ||||
Silicon nitride bonded silicon carbide bricks | 16 | 2.66 | 190 | 61.1 (1 400 ℃×0.5 h) |
Test bricks | Maximum corrosion depth |
---|---|
Magnesium aluminate spinel brick | 18.6 |
Magnesia chrome brick | 7.7 |
Spinel chrome corundum brick | 7.2 |
Chrome corundum brick | 4.4 |
Chrome corundum castable | 5.9 |
Magnesia alumina chrome composite spinel brick | 4.7 |
Table 2 Maximum corrosion depth of refractories /mm
Test bricks | Maximum corrosion depth |
---|---|
Magnesium aluminate spinel brick | 18.6 |
Magnesia chrome brick | 7.7 |
Spinel chrome corundum brick | 7.2 |
Chrome corundum brick | 4.4 |
Chrome corundum castable | 5.9 |
Magnesia alumina chrome composite spinel brick | 4.7 |
Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | Cr2O3 | MnO | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.34 | 10.62 | 8.80 | 12.75 | 0.36 | 4.50 | 1.05 | 60.78 | 0.80 |
Table 3 Chemical composition of slag layer /mass%
Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | Cr2O3 | MnO | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.34 | 10.62 | 8.80 | 12.75 | 0.36 | 4.50 | 1.05 | 60.78 | 0.80 |
Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | Cr2O3 | MnO | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.32 | 9.16 | 18.53 | 13.31 | 0.29 | 7.58 | 0.95 | 48.96 | 0.89 |
Table 4 Chemical composition of slag layer of spinel chrome corundum brick /mass%
Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | Cr2O3 | MnO | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.32 | 9.16 | 18.53 | 13.31 | 0.29 | 7.58 | 0.95 | 48.96 | 0.89 |
Depth /mm | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | ZrO2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1.51 | 58.59 | 8.23 | 1.08 | 18.21 | 11.17 | - |
3 | 2.85 | 53.77 | 10.76 | 0.80 | 17.92 | 9.26 | 3.21 |
6 | 3.34 | 52.48 | 6.82 | 0.73 | 24.67 | 6.62 | 3.82 |
9 | 2.02 | 59.30 | 10.02 | 1.79 | 16.30 | 5.19 | 3.46 |
12 | 3.94 | 56.12 | 8.46 | 1.75 | 17.84 | 6.56 | 4.02 |
15 | 3.88 | 54.42 | 5.04 | 3.29 | 20.74 | 6.13 | 4.61 |
20 | 5.43 | 52.63 | 3.27 | 4.06 | 18.65 | 1.91 | 3.92 |
Table 5 EDS results of spinel chrome corundum brick along permeation direction /mass%
Depth /mm | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | ZrO2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1.51 | 58.59 | 8.23 | 1.08 | 18.21 | 11.17 | - |
3 | 2.85 | 53.77 | 10.76 | 0.80 | 17.92 | 9.26 | 3.21 |
6 | 3.34 | 52.48 | 6.82 | 0.73 | 24.67 | 6.62 | 3.82 |
9 | 2.02 | 59.30 | 10.02 | 1.79 | 16.30 | 5.19 | 3.46 |
12 | 3.94 | 56.12 | 8.46 | 1.75 | 17.84 | 6.56 | 4.02 |
15 | 3.88 | 54.42 | 5.04 | 3.29 | 20.74 | 6.13 | 4.61 |
20 | 5.43 | 52.63 | 3.27 | 4.06 | 18.65 | 1.91 | 3.92 |
Depth /mm | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | Cr2O3 | MnO2 | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 11.08 | 16.36 | 11.61 | - | 4.87 | 0.88 | 54.13 | 0.84 |
0 | 1.83 | 55.03 | 10.53 | - | 14.32 | 0.52 | 17.05 | - |
5 | 0.64 | 61.17 | 12.14 | 0.67 | 19.85 | - | 4.78 | - |
10 | 0.89 | 53.93 | 11.97 | 2.09 | 23.74 | - | 6.14 | - |
15 | 0.94 | 54.28 | 7.83 | 4.13 | 26.24 | - | 4.79 | - |
Original brick | 1.28 | 53.59 | 1.89 | 0.80 | 35.52 | - | 6.36 | - |
Table 6 EDS results of chrome corundum brick along permeation direction /mass%
Depth /mm | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | Cr2O3 | MnO2 | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 11.08 | 16.36 | 11.61 | - | 4.87 | 0.88 | 54.13 | 0.84 |
0 | 1.83 | 55.03 | 10.53 | - | 14.32 | 0.52 | 17.05 | - |
5 | 0.64 | 61.17 | 12.14 | 0.67 | 19.85 | - | 4.78 | - |
10 | 0.89 | 53.93 | 11.97 | 2.09 | 23.74 | - | 6.14 | - |
15 | 0.94 | 54.28 | 7.83 | 4.13 | 26.24 | - | 4.79 | - |
Original brick | 1.28 | 53.59 | 1.89 | 0.80 | 35.52 | - | 6.36 | - |
Depth /mm | Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | P2O5 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 0.38 | 8.58 | 13.17 | 17.67 | 0.36 | - | 6.11 | 52.24 |
0 | 0.40 | 1.03 | 57.52 | 8.06 | 0.37 | - | 22.62 | 10.00 |
5 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 54.86 | 10.36 | 2.01 | - | 25.37 | 6.14 |
10 | 0.67 | 0.19 | 59.30 | 5.68 | 3.05 | 0.63 | 26.60 | 3.87 |
15 | 0.67 | - | 55.14 | 4.34 | 4.68 | 1.82 | 28.95 | 4.17 |
20 | - | - | 54.52 | 0.59 | 2.79 | 0.74 | 37.56 | 3.80 |
Table 7 EDS results of chrome corundum castable along permeation direction /mass%
Depth /mm | Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | P2O5 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 0.38 | 8.58 | 13.17 | 17.67 | 0.36 | - | 6.11 | 52.24 |
0 | 0.40 | 1.03 | 57.52 | 8.06 | 0.37 | - | 22.62 | 10.00 |
5 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 54.86 | 10.36 | 2.01 | - | 25.37 | 6.14 |
10 | 0.67 | 0.19 | 59.30 | 5.68 | 3.05 | 0.63 | 26.60 | 3.87 |
15 | 0.67 | - | 55.14 | 4.34 | 4.68 | 1.82 | 28.95 | 4.17 |
20 | - | - | 54.52 | 0.59 | 2.79 | 0.74 | 37.56 | 3.80 |
Depth /mm | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | MnO2 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 10.62 | 10.82 | 12.09 | 0.32 | 0.86 | 6.64 | 57.31 | 0.98 |
0 | 16.08 | 8.62 | 3.05 | - | 0.77 | 4.57 | 65.11 | 1.81 |
2 | 53.42 | 2.16 | 2.20 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 1.21 | 38.65 | 1.67 |
5 | 78.70 | 7.71 | 2.04 | 2.26 | - | 5.38 | 3.91 | - |
10 | 81.40 | 3.41 | 3.25 | 3.34 | - | 5.12 | 3.47 | - |
15 | 83.92 | 3.15 | 2.60 | 2.39 | - | 4.30 | 3.63 | - |
Original brick | 83.30 | 3.58 | 2.30 | 3.67 | - | 3.41 | 3.74 | - |
Table 8 EDS results of magnesia alumina chrome composite spinel brick along permeation direction /mass%
Depth /mm | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | MnO2 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | NiO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slag | 10.62 | 10.82 | 12.09 | 0.32 | 0.86 | 6.64 | 57.31 | 0.98 |
0 | 16.08 | 8.62 | 3.05 | - | 0.77 | 4.57 | 65.11 | 1.81 |
2 | 53.42 | 2.16 | 2.20 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 1.21 | 38.65 | 1.67 |
5 | 78.70 | 7.71 | 2.04 | 2.26 | - | 5.38 | 3.91 | - |
10 | 81.40 | 3.41 | 3.25 | 3.34 | - | 5.12 | 3.47 | - |
15 | 83.92 | 3.15 | 2.60 | 2.39 | - | 4.30 | 3.63 | - |
Original brick | 83.30 | 3.58 | 2.30 | 3.67 | - | 3.41 | 3.74 | - |
[1] |
Guang Chu, Sijia Zhao, Tianzu Yang. Extraction of nickel from molybdenum leaching residue of metalliferous black shale by segregation roasting and acid leaching. Journal of Central South University, 2012,19(2):340-346.
DOI URL |
[2] | Guo Wenxi, Su Zhenggang, Ma Yuchi, Zhang Weijun. Research and design for vertical reduction furnace of laterite nickel ore. Energy for Metallurgical Industry (in Chinese), 2015,34(6):40-41, 61. |
[3] | Li Xiaobo, Xuan Lu. Experimental study on reduction roasting of limonitic laterite-nickel ore. Hydrometallurgy of China (in Chinese), 2016,35(3):205-208. |
[4] | Chen Jingyou, Tan Juming. Technology of pyrometallurgical ferronickel with nickel-bearing laterite. Ferro-Alloys (in Chinese), 2008,39(3):13-15. |
[5] | Sun Chengcai, Xu Xingqi, Lv Youcheng, Li Fuhua, Wang Lin. Relationship between chemical components of laterite nickel deposite. Shandong Land and Resources (in Chinese), 2015,31(4):50-52. |
[1] | Hilmar SCHULZE-BERGKAMEN, Eric LIU, Clemens EBNER. High Quality Doloma Refractories — Essential for Stainless Steel Production [J]. China's Refractories, 2021, 30(2): 22-29. |
[2] | Ao HUANG, Shenghao LI, Yongshun ZHOU, Huazhi GU, Guangqiang LI, Yawei LI. Research Progress on Slag Resistance of Refractories with Electromagnetic Field [J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(3): 19-23. |
[3] | Yang SUN, Yong LI, Yiming GUO, Jialin SUN. Research Status of Non-oxides in Resin-bonded Al-Al2O3 Refractories with TiO2 Added [J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(3): 24-31. |
[4] | Xiaowen WU, Peng CHI, Bohao CHENG, Yuena ZHANG, Wei SU, Xin MIN, Minghao FANG, Yan’gai LIU, Zhaohui HUANG. Research and Development of Recycling Utilization of Used Refractories: A Review [J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(3): 38-47. |
[5] | ZHAO Shixian, LI Hongxia, SUN Honggang, CAI Binli, WANG Lan, KANG Yina. High Temperature Interactions of Chrome Oxide Free Refractories with Coal Slag Under Simulated Gasification Conditions [J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(2): 1-5. |
[6] | WANG Yanni, HAN Dan, LEI Xiaoyu, ZHANG Yajing. Determination of Boron in Refractories [J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(2): 37-41. |
[7] | ZENG Dafan. Development Trend of China’s Refractory Industry in the New Era [J]. China's Refractories, 2020, 29(1): 7-14. |
[8] | ZHOU Haizhong*, LI Yong, NI Shengqi. Survey on State of Baosteel Phase One M-type Coke Oven and Practices [J]. , 2019, 28(3): 8-14. |
[9] | TIAN Xuekun, CHEN Anbang, LI Na, LIAO Guihua, DING Dafei, YE Guotian. Effect of Andalusite Aggregate Pre-fired at Different Temperatures on Properties of Al2O3-SiC-C Castables [J]. , 2019, 28(2): 41-45. |
[10] | YI Shuai, DENG Lina, ZENG Luju, XUE Fei, PAN Chuancai, LIN Guowei, LIU Yueqiang, ZHANG Hang, XIE Jinli. Effects of Chemical Composition and Microstructure on Exudation of Fused Cast AZS Refractory Materials [J]. , 2019, 28(2): 23-26. |
[11] | ZHANG Guotan, LI Chenchen, LIANG Yonghe, WANG Wei. Influence of Silicon Oxynitride on Slag Resistance of Al2O3-SiC-C Refractory [J]. , 2019, 28(1): 36-40. |
[12] | LIU Wentao, ZHU Xiaodong, XU Zhimin, ZHU Huailing. Key Points of Monolithic Lining Engineering of Rotary Kilns [J]. , 2018, 27(4): 21-25. |
[13] | ZHU Boquan, LI Xiangcheng, CHEN Ping'an, WEI Guoping, WANG Xuan. Effect of One/Two-dimensional Bonding Phases on Strength and Toughness of Carbon-containing Refractories [J]. , 2018, 27(3): 8-20. |
[14] | Shengli JIN*, Harald HARMUTH, Dietmar GRUBER, Amina SIDI MAMMAR. Advanced Measures to Characterize Mechanical Properties of Refractories [J]. , 2018, 27(1): 8-13. |
[15] | SHEN Mingke, WEI Guoping, XUE Junzhu, HE Bo. Effect of SiO2 Micropowder Addition on Properties of Alumina-magnesia Based Wet Gunning Mix for Working Layer [J]. , 2017, 26(4): 12-16. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Address: No.43 Xiyuan Road, Luoyang 471039, China
E-mail: chnr@nhcl.com.cn
Website: www.cnref.cn